Saccheri was the first to examine the consequences of assuming the Parallel Postulate to be false; that is, he attempted a proof by contradiction. Reductio ad absurdum, or proof by contradiction, is an indirect means of proving a statement. Simply put, in order to prove something, you assume it to be false. If you can show that the assumption lead to contradiction, then the assumed falsity of the statement is itself false, implying that the statement is true. This is acceptable line of reasoning that has been used since the days of classic Greek logic. Euclid himself use it in Elements, but not in reference to the Parallel Postulate.
In Saccheri's quest to prove the Parallel Postulate, he assumed it to be false. Thereby hoping to obtain some sort of logical contradiction. The denial of the Parallel Postulate consist of two alternatives.
- Given a line and a point not on the line, there are no lines through the point parallel to the original line (parallel doesn't exist.
- Given a line and a point not on the line, there are at least two lines through the point parallel to the original line
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
wiki : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girolamo_Saccheri
No comments:
Post a Comment